Sunday, January 24, 2016

Right to Practice My Religion According to the Dictates of My Own Conscience

Joseph Lyman Jessop trial (Life Magazine 1944)
It was an early spring morning on March 7th, 1944 in Salt Lake City when my father, Marvin Jessop then only eight years old, heard loud shouts and the hard scuffling of shoes outside his bedroom door.  In a chaotic scene designed to intimidate and scare, five police officers banged loudly before bursting through the doors of the sleeping polygamist household and began rummaging through bookcases, dressers, closets, and personal belongings as they worked their way upstairs to Lyman’s bedroom where he was ordered into the hallway. 

As the Jessop children emptied out of their beds and into the hallway to see the commotion they found their dad standing in his underwear surrounded by Salt Lake City police officers demanding answers to their questions. The officers began questioning the children as well, trying to catch them in a possible trap to be used as evidence regarding their religious practices. Marvin remembers that, “My Dad stood tall and straight—the best he could while surrounded by police officers–instructed us to not be afraid, assuring us we did not have to answer any of the questions, to which one police officer responded by punching Dad with his flashlight and barking at him to SHUSH...We’ll do with you how we please. You are under arrest!”

A similar scene unfolded in other polygamist homes throughout the Salt Lake Valley as an orchestrated raid by federal and state authorities designed to deal a fatal blow to the fledgling polygamist movement in Utah was carried out. Children of polygamists woke to their houses filled with police officers and their fathers being escorted to the back seats of cruisers. There was no resistance from the polygamists. In fact, in Rulon Allred’s home where my mother, Sharon who was only two years old at the time, Rulon actually asked one of his wives to fix breakfast for the police officers—which she did.

By the time the day was over, forty-six arrests had been made. The polygamist homes were searched for any scrap of incriminating evidence regarding beliefs and lifestyle, including hymn books, scriptures, and personal correspondence that might point to their polygamist practices. It was an ominous day forever burned into the memory of polygamists and to the present day serves as a constant reminder of just how precarious their rights have been, and still are when it comes to practicing their religion.

Polygamist men posing in front of  Utah State Prison 1944
My two grandfathers, Lyman Jessop and Rulon Allred along with other polygamist leaders, proudly stood trial and served prison time behind bars. Marvin Jessop, now eighty years old, remembers how tough it was to have his father in prison, as it took a devastating financial and emotional toll on their large family compelling them to pull together in order to make it through those difficult months. Even though it was hard Marvin nostalgically recalls the few times when he got to visit his dad at the prison yard and how, "I got to touch dad's fingers through the chain link fence."  Having their dad behind bars was hard on the Jessop family but they drew closer together with an even stronger religious conviction and, “Strengthen our resolve, our determination to be like him.”

The prisoners were eventually released, after nine months, under the signed promise to abandon their polygamist practices. The raid and prison sentences started what is known as the post manifesto polygamist “underground” days and signaled an ironic twist within the history of Mormonism.  

The mainstream Mormon Church had officially given up the practice of polygamy in 1890 with the issuing of the Manifesto due largely to an incredible amount of political and economic pressure from the federal government.  The result of that pressure prior to 1890 actually created a polygamist underground sub-culture within the church in order to avoid fines and jail time for breaking cohabitation laws.  Even after the 1890 Manifesto and up until 1904, when the church issued the so called Second Manifesto, the Church continued to privately and discretely sanction the practice of polygamy by sending polygamists outside U.S. jurisdiction to Mexico and Canada therefore furthering the sub culture of polygamy to stay alive within the shadows of the Church.

By the 1920’s however, the Church tried to aggressively distance itself from the practice of polygamy.  The once hounded and harassed church reversed roles and zealously collaborated with federal and state authorities by informing, spying on, and helping prosecute still practicing “apostate” polygamists.  The outcome was similar to what happened in the Church before the Manifesto in that it forced the modern day polygamist underground in an attempt to avoid the scolding hand of their "mother" church.  

Consequently, a love-hate relationship has emerged in the last seventy to eighty years between polygamists and the LDS Church.  Polygamists have tried to hang on to the historical church as founded by Joseph Smith, and in particular Brigham Young, yet distance themselves from what they perceive as a church in a state of apostasy from its founding principles. Some polygamists particularly those in the AUB group have felt like the bastard child of a church that created them but now refuses to acknowledge their existence. 

From the Churches view they see a group of people who have given up their privilege to be part of the Church because of half-truths, rumors, lies and falsehoods.   In some cases polygamist men skirted the edges of what could be described as stealing away young stalwart church women to become part of their polygamist families. Polygamist groups have essentially attached themselves as a barnacle to the underbelly of the LDS ship often making it very hard to distinguish what is ship and what is barnacle. 

As a fully active member of the LDS Church I support their stand in trying to distance and differentiate themselves from the dozens of off-shoot polygamist groups.  However, the history of how they have dealt with polygamists particularly their willing collaboration in raiding, prosecuting, and jailing them is one the Church should not be proud of.  Simply put, for a Church that spent its founding years being mobbed, robbed, fined, and imprisoned to later reverse roles in the wake of the 1890 manifesto is not right.  The LDS Church should have been the first to protect the religious rights of people to practice their religion according to the dictates of their own conscience. 

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Group Vine really Joe? I think everyone knows you cut yourself from the VINE long ago! Now your just a shriveled up sun baked rasin! Oh why can't Marv's boys just keep to themselves and leave those of us good wholesome fruit alone? Misery I suppose will always want company, but we don't won't your unenlightened company. I can smell the sulfur eminating from this horrible attempt at a blog,as if there is something you can say that will put a damper on our awesomeness. Remind me if you will what happens to those who don't bring forth good fruit? Are they not cast in to blazing fire and destroyed? Oh joe it's not to late to rehydrate the little raisin you've become, and yet be useful for something even be it a pudding of rice. O and lo before it's to late find the vine again before the fire is kindled against you.

Same Old Joe said...

Welcome Mr Black

Anonymous said...

Kind of a cool peek into our history but I'm just a little curious as to what Joe's purpose is?

Anonymous said...

Well you got one thing right. Marv's boys as nothing but trouble. In fact dangerous to even associate with. Why they actually believe that men are free to worship God according to the dictates of their own conscience

Anonymous said...

I sense a contentious and evil spirit on this blog. I for 1 will continue to fight such filth and degradation. Death to all infidels and corruption. Oh and racist.

Anonymous said...

Deference to Biased Professionals Church leaders rely on church historians for their history. 388 Church historians have been continually warned to only present church-positive narratives and evidences at penalty of their jobs. That historian or scholar who delights in pointing out the weaknesses and frailties of present or past leaders destroys faith. A destroyer of faith—particularly one within the Church, and more particularly one who is employed specifically to build faith—places himself in great spiritual jeopardy. He is serving the wrong master, and unless he repents, he will not be among the faithful in the eternities....Do not spread disease germs! (President Boyd K. Packer, “The Mantle is Far, Far Greater Than the Intellect”, 1981, BYU Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 259-271.) And again, Any who are tempted to rake through the annals of history, to use truth unrighteously, or to dig up facts with the intent to defame or destroy, should hearken to this warning of scripture: ‘The wrath of God is…against all…who hold the truth in unrighteousness.’ To anyone who, because of truth, may be tempted to become a dissenter against the Lord and his anointed, weigh carefully your action… (Elder Russell M. Nelson, “Truth—and More,” Ensign, Jan. 1986, p. 69.)

Anonymous said...

Two public examples of the enforcement of this long-standing policy are that of Leonard Arrington and Randy Bott. Arrington was called as the church historian in the early 1970s. He presided over a decade of unprecedented open access to church records and objectivity in church history. He was rewarded with a non-public release and replacement. More recently, Bott, an award winning religion professor at BYU, was pressured to retire after providing a quote accurately representing the church’s historical view on the priesthood ban during a time when the church was going to great measures to distance themselves from that history. The reticence of church historians to provide correct information to church leaders is apparent in official teachings. For example, in the October 2014 General Conference, Elder Nelson stated, “No Prophet has ever been elected.” Brigham Young himself said, “I was unanimously elected President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.” (Winter Quarters, Dec 27, 1847, Complete Discourses of Brigham Young, Signature Books, 2009, page 267.) Every church historian should know the basic details of the succession crisis in order to know that Brigham Young was elected president of the church, let alone that the practice of voting on candidates for leadership began before Brigham Young and continued long after him.389 Yet, no one on the correlation committee corrected Elder Nelson.390 This is not an isolated occurrence. Historical errors riddle general conference talks and church manuals. Church leaders perpetuate falsehoods in ignorance and will continue to do so until they view objective church history as valuable391 or until they reverse the precedence of disciplining church employees who publicize true history that happens to contradict the official actions and policies of the modern church. A first step is to realize and admit the errors they have made.392 Until active members value church history and stop relying upon church employees for their history,393 they will be blind to perpetuated historical falsehoods and historically contraindicated contemporary church policies.

Same Old Joe said...

Thanks for the advice and concern regarding my church standing Big Ted? I will certainly take all of it into consideration in future posts :)

Unknown said...

Hi cousin Joe! I don't really know you personally, I'm sure I was a shot nosed kid lost in the sea of faces, but of course I know Uncle Marv! I just wanted you to know, as a fellow piney, how much I enjoy your group vibe blog! The history is interesting and its refreshing to hear the good and the bad, without excuses. Your sarcastic sense of humor resonates within my Jessop bones :)

As for the "anonymous " writer......the nasty, self righteous, bigoted one....you know who you are. I think you're a bully and a coward. Only the hit crow flies...or some such nonsense. The lady doth protest to much, me thinks! Ect, ect...

Unknown said...

Oh and this is Carrie Jessop, spawn of Morris Jessop and Debbie Reynolds ;)

GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!

Those famously “dangerous” words were shouted by Patrick Henry of Virginia in March of 1775 just a few weeks before the outbreak of the A...